Multi-level
selection as an evolutionary process suggests that the ascendance and
continuance of various social ecosystems should derive from natural selection
preference for the groups and the mechanisms they present, as well as an
enhancement of the natural selection preference for the characteristics of the
individuals within these groups. At least some of the beneficial
characteristics of both groups and individuals are expected to arise from the
ontogenetic development, that is the development of one generation, of the
individual members of the species, while other of the beneficial
characteristics should arise from the phylogenetic processes, that is processes
covering several subsequent generations, that emanate as a result of the
interaction of individuals within the ecosystems; from the various grouping
mechanisms themselves. Based on a survey of current literature in many domains,
including archeology, cognitive science, economy, literature, mathematics, psychology
and sociology, we have assembled a metaphorical characterization of the
processes that have resulted from the evolution of both humans and their social
ecosystems. We term this model pretergenesis, adopting the term from a
group-specific extension of the process called epigenesis. While
epigenesis characterizes the development of the embryonic individual through a
process of successive differentiation, resulting ultimately in the adult
individual, pretergenesis illustrates through a series of metaphorical
descriptors, the processes that have driven the evolutionary development of the
social ecosystems themselves.
The model builds
a framework based on the evolutionary progression of the essential
characteristics of human multi-level processes. As the species has evolved,
people have participated in ever larger and more complex social environments,
with their resulting grouping mechanisms, where each successive level draws its
strengths from the within-group and among-group processes of its
own and surrounding levels. The full range of the represented social ecosystems
is found in the current world, suggesting that these levels can either
naturally co-exist, or that the conflict of natural selection is still at play.
Most likely, the correct assessment contains a bit of both.
A couple of
chapters back, we recognized the model of Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs as
the basis for interaction stimuli involving humans. The evolutionary
progression of species development has given rise to this hierarchy as the
foundation of human behavior. Thus, the hierarchy is essentially an
illustration of natural selection that resulted in the emergence of a
progression of physiological characteristics of the individual person. The
following table suggests a series of such characteristics that can be
associated with the succession of needs. We should note that the various
indicated characteristics always act in a cumulative fashion to meet the body’s
needs. Successive evolutionary developments may give rise to new needs, but
they may also, in parallel, help to satisfy previously expressed needs. The
development of an emotional system helped in the struggle to meet physiological
needs as well as to express and then satisfy a whole new set of needs,
specifically including that of belonging. In fact, it was likely the emergence
of the emotional system that formed the springboard for the need of belonging
in the first place.
So, we observe
that the most basic of needs, physiological needs, are a detailed
reflection of organic physiology. As we’ve noted previously, the requirements
that the body has for sustenance evoke a variety of appetite indicators that
provide a macroscopic signal of the need. Thus, when the body wants for air, a
reflexive action to breath is stimulated. When we want for water, thirst
stimulates our actions toward finding drink.
The second level
of needs, those of safety and security, were likely salved by the rise
of reflexive facilities that serve to take us more quickly out of harms way.
The emergence of the emotional
|