receive the message. When the receiving telephone gets the message, an
indicator is provided to the user to indicate that the message is waiting. It
is then up to the user to display the message on the handset.
Facsimile
transmissions are handled in a similar fashion. When using a scanning facsimile
machine at the input mechanism, the sender enters the network address, which is
the telephone number of the destination facsimile machine, and starts the
transmission. Depending on the type of receiving equipment being used, the
pages of transmitted material may either be printed directly to paper on
reception or they may be stored with only an indicator sent on to the intended
receiving person. And, of course, standard telephony involves the caller
entering an address in the form of a telephone number of the intended recipient
of the call. If the receiving unit is not busy, then an indicator lets the
person know that a call is waiting; accordingly, the phone rings. Each of these
examples illustrates the sender as being the originator of the interaction.
Content is either directly delivered to the recipient, or an indicator lets the
recipient know that content is pending.
The PUSH model
relative to Web services generally involves a Web server providing content to a
user at the discretion of the server rather than of the user. In the concept of
the model that Gleick discussed, one’s interest in certain topics would become
known over time, through a public compilation of past transactions that would
become available to content providers, and the content providers would then
automatically, without expressed invocation on the part of the user, deliver
content.
In the PULL
model, the recipient of content indicates a needs based stimulus to effect the
subsequent provision of content; someone who needs something asks for it to be
provided. If we don’t want to deal with live telephone calls, then we allow our
voice-mail systems to receive the call and queue up messages from the senders.
We are then able to listen to our messages at a time of our choosing. In other
words, we can pull the waiting messages whenever it is convenient for us.
Probably the
more common PULL model example is that which we experience through our Web
browsers. The paradigm for this interaction is essentially an imperative, “Show
me that!” When we issue this command, we indicate direction to a page that we’d
like to look at by specifying a universal resource locator (say
http://www.nyt.com for the New York Times) to our Web browser. The browser then
proceeds to execute a standard protocol through which the Web server defined by
the universal resource locator is contacted and the particular Web page that we
demanded to see is displayed on our screen. As the facilities to effect
commerce have evolved, as we’ve become empowered to purchase content on or
through the Internet, the paradigm has expanded to include the subsequent
command “Provide me that!” or, more succinctly put and appropriate to the
consumer role, “Gimme!” This is perhaps the defining characteristic in
transforming the more basic Internet into the Web.
The Web today
can provide content that maps to sustenance in varying degrees across the full
range of the human needs hierarchy. However, while the Web is capable of
offering this wide range of sustenance, it does not yet facilitate the full
range of social ecosystem mechanisms that have proven so necessary to the
species in the actual incorporation of such sustenance. Through the Web, our
sensory facilities present us the fact or the illusion of sustenance, or
perhaps more appropriately stated, they provide us various projections of the
existence of sustenance, but we are
|