It is hopefully
clear, but never too late for us to clarify the fact that we see parallels
between many aspects of the application of religion and similar aspects in the
use, or potential use of computers. We do not consider computers in general, or
their trusted core, as religious objects in their own right or as elements of
overt religious practice. The parallel that we’ve drawn to the evolution and
use of computers is the recurring presence of religion and its mechanisms
during the evolution of mankind. We do this with the utmost respect for
religious practice. We do not perceive our considerations as demeaning the
concepts of religion, but rather of elevating the concepts of technical
evolution in general and computers specifically. That said, we do recognize
somewhat tongue in cheek that a properly laminated variant of one’s American
Express Platinum Card would make a good tombstone in that it says a lot about
how we spent our lives as well as our money.
It is
anecdotally appropriate to mention that we were drawn to the idea that religion
is a recurring theme in societal evolution from the viewpoint of how we’ve seen
technology, particularly computers, evolve. It was only after this slow dawning
that we perceived that religion as an evolutionary mechanism was a mature field
in its own right as studied from the viewpoint of evolutionary biology. Building
on this realization, we subsequently found many interesting and diverse chains
of discovery within the literature of fields of study centered on cognitive
science and developmental psychology. We have drawn from some of the seminal
works of the genre a number of areas that seem to offer striking insights into
the technology realm of computers.
Perhaps one of
the more profound aspects to us has been the concept of multi-level selection
derived from grouping mechanisms, as well as individual natural selection, as
evolutionary principle of species. Specifically in the case of humans, it has
been illuminating to note the credibility of religion as a general mechanism in
the multi-level selection process. While our digital identity plunges into the
networked crowds and their subtle, reflexive, ever bouncing interactions, where
does the trusted computer take its inspiration? Or does it need to? Does it
belong?
For millennia,
the justification for governance in China derived from the Mandate of Heaven. For
cycle upon cycle of dynasties of Chinese emperors, the right to govern was
derived from this precept; those who come to power must discern among paths
they follow and select those that provide for the welfare of the people. For
those dynasties that depart from the correct way, Heaven withdraws its mandate
and a new regime is obligated to revolt and assume control. While China is today ostensibly one of the most
a-religious countries in the world, in fact it is difficult to see much
difference in governance from the days of the emperors. The Cultural Revolution
of the second half of the XXth Century has most of the
characteristics of a theocratic schism. Such characteristics include a vision
from a charismatic leader, a shaman by any other name, that guided the actions
of multitudes of the faithful to effect justice and vengeance on those not
sufficiently fervent in the faith. A fertile field, it would seem, in which to
sow the seeds of the trusted computer variety of complex policy.
The largest
market for personal technology today is China. A powerful country where the fragile
equilibrium between independence and centralization has endured millennia of
conflicts, this was a country where historical happenstance would widely open
the gates for various technical venues, personal computers included. Bypassing
the establishment of pre-digital infrastructures found in old industrial
countries, the expansion of China has been fueled by the deployment of
extremely advanced telecommunications and banking infrastructures; all based on
the possibility to locally
|