Blog
Knol

water in an egalitarian display of terminal dodge ball. The crocodiles lying in wait under the water can’t tell if the wildebeest they are about to drag beneath the surface in a death roll are healthy, weak, a mother or among the newborn young. So, our conceptions of the laws of nature resulting in the culling of the old or the weak from the herd fall by the wayside. In fact, some arbitrary few are sacrificed and the herd benefits.

How does this fit into the framework of selection? Well, we have to consider the possibility that a threat can be global to the group as well as to an individual. The sacrificial trait can grow in order to minimize the global threat. By developing the sacrificial trait, wildebeest are able to survive as a group. Of course, we haven’t yet explained why the wildebeest want to be in a group. Nevertheless, the group by surviving, in turn allows many of them to survive individually. This is the core and the enabler of multi-level selection. Thus, we suggest that multi-level selection might well be observed when applied to groups of individuals. Under threat, the groups are under pressure, as well as the individuals in each group. Individuals will be faced with the conflicting demands made on them by both group and individual threats. Of course, we must remember that in some instances the impetus for grouping fails. The Mayans we considered in the first chapter apparently crossed this boundary; the wildebeest didn’t.

As another example, let’s consider a military anecdote; a company constituted of four platoons, facing an overwhelming enemy. The company commander may decide that the only way to save most of the force is to sacrifice one platoon to fix the enemy in place, thereby limiting the enemy’s mobility while the other friendly platoons withdraw. One might think that the soldiers of the platoon left behind would have different personal preferences. However, some mechanism causes them to orient their actions toward the group’s benefit rather than their own. Interaction between the selective pressures will define the situation, all under the prism of evolution. The interesting question remains; in the case of selection favoring a group, what is the feedback mechanism that speaks to the continuation of the group? We’ll consider this in greater detail in Chapter 5.

Perhaps one of the more difficult aspects of evolutionary processes for us to assimilate is the statistical nature of their being. It is the classical situation of forests and trees. When we’re immersed in the individual characteristics of a tree, it requires some rather careful analysis to perceive the statistical nature of the forest. Our rather natural inclination is to attempt to see and appreciate the dynamics of evolutionary change in terms of our everyday experience; through anecdotal example if you will. Indeed, we’ve already suggested that very low probability events are indistinguishable from miracles. Seen in this light, it is difficult to fathom the prospect of evolutionary change that leads from the most simple, single cell life to the magnificent logical complexity of the human mind or the subtle mechanical complexity of the human eye. To make this leap through a single mutational event seems too fantastic to believe, and, in fact, it is. On the other hand, if we can accept the results of statistical processes involving very large numbers confronted with lots of opportunity for small changes in an incredibly large number of instances spread over an incomprehensible amount of time, then evolutionary change seems much more palatable.

Selection by Markets

At the beginning of this chapter, we set out to consider the area of overlap of the mechanisms of evolutionary change of first, organic life and then, of computers. At this point, we’ve made our overview examination of the mechanisms of life; now let’s look at the mechanisms of computers.

Book available at Midori Press (regular)
Book available at Midori Press (signed)
Book available at Amazon (regular)