the proper protocols. For example, the computer must be
able to process the input of the other computers using first its appropriate
specialized input/output modules, and then the applications that know how to
process the information at hand. Correspondingly, a person needs to hear the
voice of another person and interpret it, using voice recognition modules and
more general capabilities of language understanding.
Once a group is
established, within the group each person can use an interaction or collection
of interactions to promote the business at hand. For example, a person may read
a document to the group, using document processing skills (reading and
modulation of content) as well as communication skills (converting the content
into spoken sentences processed by the voice output module). Similarly, the
computer may, for instance, be scanning a photo, converting it into the proper
bits of information via the scanner interaction module, and then, say use a
compression application, and then the transmission module, to send the image to
another computer. In this way, the computer and personal applications can
effect their desired end.
So, we have
something of a cursory overview of the interaction environment that we’d like
to better understand. Let’s now delve into an overview of the inner workings of
people and then computers in order to see if we can find some similarities in
the basis for the policy environments in each case.
The abstract,
systematic study of the human body includes a number of discrete disciplines.
Two basic and interrelated such disciplines are anatomy and physiology. Anatomy
comprises the study of the static characteristics of the body. It encompasses the
consideration of the body’s structure and makeup: skeleton, linkage tissues,
muscles, nerves, fluid systems, organs and the like. The study of the general
dynamic systems of the body is termed physiology. Physiology concerns itself
with the physical processes through which a person’s body supports its
continued living as facilitated by both its internal interactions as well as
its interactions with the physical world in which it exists. As a prelude to
consideration of the human body’s operational processes, it is perhaps useful
to observe that most such processes make use of active control of systems that
operate from positions of unstable equilibrium. Thus, generally opposing
mechanisms are used to effect motor control through positive impulses from the
body’s control systems, the central and peripheral nervous systems. To move an
arm requires the coordination of opposing muscles and to transmit an impulse
across a nerve requires coordination of opposing chemical components. Such an
approach to command and control of the body relies heavily on a highly
structured and hence hierarchically capable cognitive system that is the
centerpiece of the human sensori-motor experience. In turn, the sensori-motor
experience provides conceptual framework for human cognition. Consider the
following.
As we discussed
previously, the physical ecosystem within which living organisms exist effects
interactions through the four basic forces: gravity, the electromagnetic force,
the weak force and the strong force. Virtually all interactions that human
physiology supports are based on electromagnetic and gravity based processes.
Many of the electromagnetic based processes are presented to the human body
through secondary or indirect mechanisms. These indirect mechanisms establish
the metaphors through which cognitive system perceives the physical world
around us. We see things. We hear things. We feel things. We touch
things. We smell things. We taste things. These are all
manifestations of the electromagnetic force. Establishing context through which
metaphorical understanding becomes a significant basis of human cognition would
|