The work of
these three, while certainly augmented by many others, suggests an interesting
model for the progressive establishment of the human mind as an operating unit.
MacLean offers a model of brain structure that suggests a formative process for
the evolutionary development of the physiological facilities of the brain. It
posits an embodiment of subsystem based architecture that has many of the
characteristics of human designed systems, including that of computers.
Overlaid on this physiological structure, Donald’s work can be interpreted to
suggest an information storage structure and processing model that facilitates
the manner in which the human mind acquires and stores knowledge derived from
the human sensori-motor and autonomic systems. If we adopt this combination
conceptual model, Piaget’s work can then be interpreted to express how humans
systematically provision this storage structure and processing paradigm. In
essence, this provisioning operation includes what we might think of in
mechanical systems as setup and calibration operations that are effected
through heuristic processes which
consist in trials where success brings validation and failure prompts another
trial. In all three cases, extremely similar models are observed in virtually
all ostensibly normal individuals. Thus, we observe the apparent operation of a
feedback loop that encompasses more than just physiological characteristics,
that one might assume are the sole targets of DNA conveyance, and instead evokes the
recurring form, including content, of cognition.
Therefore, with
that model in mind, including our questions regarding the feedback loop
mechanisms whose operations we seem to observe, let us consider in just a bit
more detail the suggestions and observations of these respective models.
Paul MacLean
proposed that the current structure of the human brain has developed from three
distinct phases of the long evolution of the vertebrates. Further to this
phylogenetic perspective, he has taken the perspective of anatomy, chemistry,
neurology, surgery, and other measures to identify the descent of these three
constituents of the human brain. He has termed the resulting modern structure
the triune brain, meaning the brain
with three parts. His proposition is not that humans actually function with
three distinct brains, but rather that those three components of the brain
operate in an integrated fashion with a different focus of function within each
part. From a computer perspective, this appears very much like a major system
functioning through the interactive activities of three subsystems. None of
these subsystems is entirely independent, but all three do exhibit aspects of
autonomy in certain situations and in certain areas. Here, as throughout this
book, we will be faithful to our reference material, in this case The Triune Brain in Evolution. We make
no independent pronouncement in the domain of neurophysiology. Rather, we follow
MacLean in his reviewing the measured steps of cumulative development of the
brain as a progressively enhanced system achieved through the evolution of
vertebrate species. During embryonic growth in particular, the ontogenetic
development of the individual human provides striking illustration of these
three subsystems. Further advances in the understanding of the ontogenetic
development of the individual, along the lines of Sean Carrol’s presentation of
evolutionary developmental biology in Endless
Forms Most Beautiful, are likely to help refine MacLean’s model.
From our
perspective, the triune brain is an excellent metaphorical match to the
structure of a wide variety of computer systems. It is a brain comprised of
subsystems, forming the interactive architecture of the complete brain system,
each providing specialized facilities in distinct areas. As we will discuss in
more detail just a bit later, computer systems typically have a low-level
subsystem that deals with the interface between real-time actions, activities
driven mostly by
|