also a scholar, holding a Doctor
of Theology degree from the University of Wittenberg. After a life of contemplation of his
relationship with his God, Luther finally reached a point in which his trust in
the teachings of the Roman Catholic Church did not match his perceptions of
this relationship. While in his writings Luther noted many concerns, the
central focus of his preemptive challenge to the Church dealt with the sale of
indulgences, particularly by a Dominican priest by the name of Johann Tetzel.
In 1517, Tetzel, under authority granted by Rome, was charged with raising money through
the sale of indulgences for the continued construction of St. Peter’s Basilica.
An indulgence was a credential that, for the bearer diminished the prospect of temporal
punishment for sins, for some arbitrary period of time, while not completely
removing all consequences of such sins in the afterlife. Tetzel’s marketing
approach might not have been quite so nuanced, leading the buyer to perhaps
expect full remission of sins. Luther’s precipitous act was to nail a list of
95 Theses, that is, questions and assertions regarding both claims and nuance,
on the door of Wittenberg Cathedral on All Saints Day in the year 1517. The
document comprised a point-by-point appraisal of the concepts of sin and its
consequences resulting in a wholesale condemnation of the policy defined and
implemented by the Church through its collective interpretation of the Christian Bible.
Consider the 8th
of his 95 Theses; roughly translated it tells us “The penitential canons apply
only to men who are still alive, and, according to the canons themselves, none
applies to the dead.” This is a rather radical re-definition of the boundaries
of the theological infrastructure of the Roman Catholic Church of the XVIth
Century. It asserts that the directions of the Church, as applied to the
actions of man, extend only to the boundary between life and death, not beyond.
Beyond death was strictly the purview of God, not worldly constructs such as
the Church. For the Church of that era, this was not merely intellectual dogma;
this was the economic livelihood of the papal organization itself. Being
specifically aimed at the sale of indulgences,
those “get out of purgatory free” cards so popular with the ecclesiastical
community of the time, Luther’s challenge, if not thwarted, would result in the
loss of significant financial prowess, and hence power, of the Church within
this worldly domain. Adding emphasis to the point, the Church of Rome truly
needed any financial assistance it could get. Pope Leo X, from the House of
Medici in Florence, was something of a suspect steward of
the Church’s treasury. Within two years of his ascendance to the Throne of St.
Peter in 1513, his profligate spending had almost totally depleted the ample
treasury of the Church that had been accumulated under the tutelage of his
predecessor, Pope Julius II. Consequently, indulgences, or at least their sale,
were among the few equity resources remaining. Hence Luther’s machinations were
of the highest importance to the Church.
The 20th
of the 95 Theses is equally profound, “Therefore, the Pope, in speaking of the
plenary remission of all penalties, does not mean ‘all’ in the strict sense,
but only those imposed by him.” Not only are the boundaries of the policy infrastructure
revised, but also the administrative authority of the primary policy arbiter of
the infrastructure is restricted. In fact, as prefaced in the 6th
Thesis, “The Pope himself cannot remit guilt, but only declare and confirm that
it has been remitted by God…” As we will see in more detail later in this book,
the success of this challenge constitutes a change in the policies of the Roman
Catholic Church as well as in the very boundaries of influence and control of
the Church itself. This is policy definition or redefinition of the first
order. Such an analysis and proposal would today certainly be a worthy subject
of the Harvard Business Review. Given the limitations on printed material, the
cathedral doors of the Castle Church of Wittenberg on All Saints Day was a more
appropriate method of that era. In any case, it certainly made for good
marketing of his ideas.
Because of his
policy machinations, Luther put himself into direct conflict with Pope Leo X,
earning the considerable enmity of the papal establishment in the process. Of
course, as sometimes
|