specifically, where a modification to a single
molecule can actually have a significant impact on the descendant generation.
One specific instance would be a change to the molecular structure of the
protein molecules that serve as markers for the replication process for a
relatively long segment of the DNA molecule. In this case, it would seem that
the induced change in the marker protein, or in its point of connection to the
DNA molecule, could result in shifting the length of the DNA segment that is
replicated, or perhaps impacting whether the segment is even replicated at all.
In any case, the resulting change in the new generation might well be a major
change in the new DNA molecule, rather than just a highly localized change. As
with point mutations, such a major systemic mutation is likely to have a
catastrophic impact on the construction of the new individual, probably
rendering it non-viable. However, in very rare occurrences, this type of change
might significantly affect the new individual, perhaps giving it some new
characteristic that renders it better able to survive and reproduce within its
environment. Since the mutation would be passed along to successive generations
of this particular individual, the net impact over time might well be positive
relative to continuation of the species.
In our first
chapter, we briefly considered the work of Gregor Mendel in establishing the
field of genetics. Through the processes described by genetics, the act of
procreation provides a well defined approach for effecting changes among the
resulting progeny. Individual characteristics of an organism derive from the
set of genes that make up its genome. The gene for a specific characteristic
can encompass some spectrum of allowed values for that characteristic. The
spectrum of allowed values is termed genetic
variability. It may be broad, meaning that a characteristic can present
many different states or values. In other cases, the genetic variability that
results from this process may be quite narrow and present only a very few states
or values. Specific states of a characteristic are selected when DNA material
from two parent individuals is contributed to the descendent generation
individual. In the case of the human species, this is the result of the
creation of the original zygote of an individual which requires a pair of each
chromosome, with one chromosome of each pair derived from each parent.
Chromosomes are differentiated DNA molecules in the cell: humans have 22 pairs
of similar chromosomes, and one additional pair of chromosomes, similar in
women (XX), and dissimilar in men (XY). The result is that replication of the
zygote is then driven by a completely new DNA sequence relative to either
parent. In some instances, an environment in which an organism exists can
preferentially select for certain states or values. The resulting organisms so
selected are said to benefit from genetic
adaptation to that environment. To reiterate, this is a normal
characteristic of sexual reproduction of a species.
Many of the
traits found in individuals can vary in the extent to which they are
represented in a new generation, depending on the characteristics of this new
combination. This means that variances in different traits may have an impact
on the relative reproductive success for the descendent generation. This
essentially provides variations that can then be subsequently judged through
natural selection. If natural body mass could have an impact on the survival of
the individual, then natural selection might enhance the generational numbers
of either larger mass individuals, or smaller mass individuals depending on the
characteristics of the environment in which the individuals are found. It is
probably obvious, but it should be noted that the greater the genetic
variability found in a species, the greater is that species capacity to adapt
to a changing environment through the process of genetic adaptation. Species
with little genetic variability essentially don’t have the option of making as
many changes to adapt, so there are fewer chances to make a good change
when a change is necessitated by a new environment.
While we have
obviously only skimmed the subject, we hope to have conveyed at this point some
appreciation of the intricacies of the biological substrate of evolution in
sufficient details to
|