across its full
geographic dispersal required the full capabilities of language; that’s a step
that we will discuss later, together with the flourishing of the common
attributes of modern man.
From an
extension perspective, the clan is probably the largest human grouping
mechanism that derives primarily from the human family grouping facilities.
That is, most of the group-reinforced mechanisms of the clan find their beginnings
in the primitive activities that the family brings to the preferential
behaviors of the species. It would seem that to achieve beneficial grouping at
a larger scale than the clan requires a synthesis of many individual
characteristics, giving rise to the concepts and mechanisms that we recognize
as religion.
The emergence of
religion as the dominant grouping mechanism likely evolved as an exploitation
of the more profound developments of the human mind, specifically the
experience of ecstasy that transcends the basic consciousness. When coupled
with rituals as a means of coordinating activities and information among
diverse populations, the ability of religion to bring concerted action to bear
on the issue of group survival and predominance began to be truly realized.
While the tribe is the first form of congregation enabled by religion,
higher-order groups can use the same mechanism of congregation to form in ever
increasing size. In parallel with the more advanced group coordination and
control that has been brought by religion, humans could use many of the same
mechanisms to effect control over the physical ecosystems in which they exist.
That is, through the development of trade and commerce, mankind has insulated
itself from many of the direct manifestations of the physical ecosystem. Trade
and commerce allow a more efficient exploitation of natural resources and
provide for greater protection against relatively unusual excursions of the
natural environment that might normally tax people in spite of the greater
protections offered by their grouping mechanisms.
A common theme
that runs through all of these grouping mechanisms is the propensity of the
group to establish the rules of interaction among members of the group and, in
some cases, between members of different groups. Family units within a clan
were likely subject to the same social mores; separate villages within a tribe
likely evoked similar customs of behavior. We suggest the characterization of
this arbitrarily defined environment of rules and the interactions that follow
as a policy infrastructure.
For the moment,
drawing from standard dictionary definitions of the word, we define the concept
of policy as a definite course or method of action selected from among alternatives
and in light of given conditions to guide and determine present and future
decisions; a plan of action adopted by an individual or social group. To fully consider the manner in which
social ecosystems address policy, we must consider the full infrastructure
through which policy is effected. The environment within which interactions
occur is essentially the boundary of the policy infrastructure. Note that we do
not characterize the policy infrastructure as being equivalent to a social ecosystem.
There’s a characteristic that the application of policy requires, the
characteristic of trust that we will describe in much more detail starting in
Chapter 5 when we delve deeper into social ecosystems. For the moment, let’s
concentrate on the various aspects of policy.
|