education,
the rest of us have to deal with painfully gaining insight into value from what
others saw and interpreted for us. However, in most instances, the value of sustenance
derives from the balance between the cost of production and the needs of the
consumer. As we noted above, the market equation for illicit drugs is an icon
for the ideal business model; production costs determined by commodity
availability and sales price determined by a consumer who has to have the
product.
An important
difference between digital content and tangible goods lies in the balance
between creation and distribution mechanisms. Typically, digital content may be
expensive to produce, but easy to distribute. Certainly, it is much easier to
distribute data over the Internet than to send a bicycle from China to the USA on a ship. Even more strikingly, digital
content is very easy to duplicate, whereas duplicating tangible goods involves
obvious costs of material. Going one step further, digital content can often be
modified with little effort and repackaged, while doing so for hard products is
often just not economically feasible.
Because it is so
easy to alter data, an extensive legal framework has been built around digital
content, or, more generally, non-tangible content, under the name of Intellectual
Property law. Copyright
forbids duplication of content without proper authorization, or specific
circumstances, patents allow one to create content but not to use it without
proper retribution, and trade secrets can be invoked to protect expensive
developments. Branding and trademarks also contribute to assessing digital
content, by associating a trusted source to the information. The same write-up
by the New York Times or by an anonymous blogger will not be given the same
weight. Finally, digital content is associated with privacy. An evolving
body of laws involves the encroachments to privacy afforded by the distribution
of information over computer networks. These laws are culturally dependent, as
for example France has forbidden for decades the indexing
of databases with cross-references allowing gathering a consistent body of
personal information about individuals. In the USA, there is no such law, so that social
security numbers have been used to index all sorts of databases, with
associated privacy encroachment. The cultural aspect of this diversity is
grounded in the definition of freedom in the USA, much centered about the
freedom of speech, while that of France is more centered around the respect of
privacy. Privacy and freedom of speech are in conflict, as they affect each
other negatively. For more protection of their privacy, the French have
accepted more limitations on their freedom of speech than the Americans afford.
Which system is better, of course, is a matter of conventions at least in part
originated in religious traditions.
The fact that
digital content is most often easy to modify has led to a body of protection
practices. Digital signature technology allows evaluating whether information
has been modified from its original version, by associating to that information
a kind of a summary (the signature) that is synchronized with the content.
Thanks to cryptographic techniques, it is not possible, or at least very hard,
to change the information and the summary at the same time while keeping them
synchronized. But of course, once the information is obtained, it can be
modified at will. Therefore, sophisticated processes have been defined for
controlling multiple versions and modifications of documents, by several
persons if needed. Under the name life cycle management, systems can not
only track the history of a piece of information, they can also recover the
stage of the information at any time in its development. Who contributed, and
what they did is logged carefully, and authorization mechanisms are put in
place to properly assess further changes. To give an idea of the importance of
such precautions, it is just a matter of looking at any Web page. Of course we
can read it today, but can we refer it to it to somebody else who will look at
it tomorrow? Will it be the same then? There are very few pages on the Web that
are versioned
|