the XIXth and XXth
Centuries. If we consider that broader linguistic studies of the same depth,
exemplified by Joseph Greenberg’s Indo-European
and its Closest Relatives: The Eurasiatic Language Family, are advances
that had to wait until the XXIst Century, we see that a global
understanding of the religious roots at the center of global myths is still
somewhat distant. However, some works like Maya
Cosmos: Three Thousand Years on the Shaman’s Path, by David Friedel, Linda
Schele and Joy Parker, already map the same advances in methodology that allowed
the decipherment of Maya writing, i.e. its decipherment in the context of
modern Maya language, to an understanding of antique Maya religious practices
in the context of modern Maya shamanistic practices. The similarity of the
underground, earth and sky trilogy, accompanied by its derivation of time and
cardinal points, between European, Middle-Eastern and Maya practices is hard to
ignore; but future inquirers will have to go through the research. The quest is
on for the roots of the social realization of religious beliefs. Since computer
networks are indeed global in nature, their shared beliefs have correspondingly
yet to find bases, starting with those of the human mind.
As networks of
computers grow and pass human organizations in size and complexity, they’ll
build their own myths, following their needs hierarchies, empowered by their
sensori-motor capabilities, and accumulating memories constantly reorganized by
time and experience. Their trust infrastructures will reflect their
evolutionary interests, and will collide along the boundaries of their
theologies. Policies arbitraged by their trust infrastructures will change as
trust clouds will merge and disassociate, eventually defining broad communities
of worldwide computer networks. As long as humans will remain the originators
of the networks and their prime benefactors, they will instill their will
through their digital representatives, the transcendent personal devices that
will summarize the human needs, myths and religions to affect the dynamic
behavior of all the actors of that augmented theater of life.
So, we return to
our specific consideration of hands and fingers. Extending the significance of
the handprints, Lewis-Williams suggests that they comprise objects of interest
in their own right, not simply as the image of a hand. He suggests that
handprints found in the Western
Cape Province
of today’s South
Africa
and worn smooth by ages of being touched by actual human hands indicates a
ritual conveyance from handprint to the hand of the supplicant who touches it.
While the object so conveyed is unknown, even as to whether it reflected
physical or spiritual concepts, the ritual itself offers interesting parallels
to practices expressed in the writings that form the basis of Judeo-Christian
religious thought. Specifically, beginning within the earliest renditions of
the Book of Genesis are found
instances of the ritual known even in the current day as the laying-on of hands.
We have no more
evidence to divine a connection of parietal handprints to the ritual laying-on
of hands than the observation that such a connection could explain the
similarity of the handprints’ environments and displays between North and South
America along proven migration routes; the ritual would provide for the
continuity of practice, in either physical or symbolic form. In any event, we
can note the central theme of the hand in each practice; a theme that offers
consistent presentation over millennia of social interaction. The ritual
laying-on of hands, recorded in historical literature at least three or four
millennia ago, offers a well traveled path from then to now. Throughout the
history of its explicit expression, the ritual has formed the basis for
conveyance of trust and authority among groups and individuals. Within the
model for social ecosystems that we have suggested, it appears as a ritual
through which trust is directly conveyed and hence forms the mechanism for
extension of the social ecosystem across space, across time, or both. In that
guise, it offers a response to the aesthetic needs of the species.
|