single set of rules that encompasses all religious. In the United States, there is however a supreme trust
infrastructure that encompasses a supreme policy infrastructure. Within this
legal environment, both civil and criminal, are found the judiciary, also
hierarchically structured and culminating in a court of last resort, the
Supreme Court. Finally, within administrative infrastructures are found the
administrators of such groups. Administrative organizations, while comprised of
persons with varying degrees of authority, essentially exert their control of
policy in the name of the highest level administrator, for example the
President.
The clergy found within different religious
organizations show a wide variance in both the authority required to place them
in the positions that they occupy within their respective congregations and the
authority that they can elicit as arbiters within these same congregations. At
one extreme of the congregations are the religious groups that are pejoratively
called cults; for example, the Branch Davidians of Waco fame (or infamy). These
are typically small, highly focused groups that break off from the central body
of a religious organization. In most instances, this schism is due to some
disagreement with theological tenets of the core religion, but it is sometimes
derived from a very strong personality that leads the small group away from the
large. Within social ecosystems, cults encompass an evolutionary mechanism
quite similar to that described in Systematics
and the Origin of Species by Ernst Mayr for organic species; a mechanism
that can result in speciation through the further process termed punctuated
equilibrium. Should a cult gain wider acceptance, it might evolve into a sect;
a similar organizational construct but one not nearly so harshly regarded by
mainstream organizations. At the other extreme lay what we might call
mainstream, organized religions. If we consider Roman Catholicism as an
example, the church encompasses a well defined, hierarchical structure within
which the clergy is established and through which it operates. The culmination
of this hierarchy is the Pope, the person in whom resides the authority as the
ultimate policy arbiter of this particular religion.
Within most
religious structures, the members of the clergy are viewed as better versed in
the tenets of the particular religious order than are the typical members, a
group sometimes referred to as the laity
to differentiate them from the clergy.
Within secular
social ecosystems, the ultimate arbiters of consequences are typically the judiciary. Depending on hierarchy, the
judiciary tends to either be directly elected by the people or appointed by a
government’s administrative arm and confirmed by an elected body. Members of
the judiciary are typically chosen from a precursor group that is ostensibly
trained in the intricacies of policy interpretation and application; that is,
attorneys. The judiciary effects its interpretation of policy through a variety
of courts. As part of the base level of the court system, sometimes referred to
as trial courts, an additional
mechanism is added to allow for the differentiation of the interpretation of
policy from the assessment of whether or not a particular interaction conforms
to stated policy. This mechanism is the jury.
A jury is comprised of some collection of ostensibly unbiased observers. Details
of interactions for which policy infractions are claimed are presented to the
jury under the auspices of the specific court. The jury is then charged with
making a determination of fact as to
the details of the interaction. Again, under the auspices of the court a
determination can then be made as to whether the interaction did, in fact,
infringe the policy in question.
The federal
judiciary comprise a hierarchical grouping whose members are all life tenured.
At the highest level, the Supreme Court of the United States functions as the ultimate arbiter of the
trust infrastructure. As we have noted, in some instances the Supreme Court
appears able to function as the ultimate purveyor of policy as well.
|