significant continuity. In particular, some
evidence of change derives from a fossil record which is anecdotal in nature.
Anecdote forms the dots of the picture. When it comes time to connect the dots,
they must be carefully evaluated if the picture is to be faithfully rendered.
We suggest that this holds true for understanding the groups within social
ecosystems just as it does for the species that inhabit the physical ecosystem.
To reinforce this understanding, we might consider in just a bit more depth the
current state of observation of the hominids, exemplified by The Speciation of Modern Homo sapiens,
edited by Tim Crow.
We can begin by
paraphrasing the concept of punctuated equilibrium that we considered in
Chapter 9. The available fossil record gives evidence suggesting many discrete
species. However, modification of DNA through mutation and genetic recombination
creates change primarily through minute steps. When the DNA of successive
generations is examined, which has been done “in the small” for the evolutionary
progression of simpler organisms, genomic alterations allow for a continuous
development of new capabilities based mostly on the reuse of older ones. Over
long enough periods of times, relative to any collection of species the
difference between the early species and the late ones may show stark
contrasts. However, the differences between one species and the next that
evolved from it may be less profound. Indeed, among the hominids as
characterized by the fossil record, it is becoming less clear where the actual
species boundaries are. If one adheres to the rather strict definition that a
species boundary delimits an ability to interbreed, then some of the more
recent distinctions among subsets of the genus Homo likely differentiate what could perhaps be called ethnic groups as opposed to distinct
species. Similar continuity holds for social systems. Indeed, when different
grouping mechanisms are examined the overlap of adjacent “species” seems even
greater. In fact, today there still exist plentiful examples of iconic forms of
human groups.
Thus, it was something of a revelation to us as we came to
understand that since the emergence of modern man, the progression of social
order has been one of remarkable continuity as well. Of course, the fact that
we could observe and suggest a possible model under which all human social
orders could be interpreted is indicative of this continuity. This progression
is marked by the recursive application of the same metaphors; metaphors that
are seminally grounded in the human sensori-motor system. As we’ve previously
noted, we were drawn down this path by the imagery of parietal art that forms
one of the earliest illustrations of modern man as a social animal. Among such
imagery are often found pictures of human hands. Hands are found imprinted in
pigments on walls of rock throughout the world and across the horizon of the
human dispersion from Africa. This common form was central to our earliest
musings that subsequently gained form in the pages of this book. Among those
illustrations are reproductions from caves in the south of France.
In 1985, Henri
Cosquer, a professional diver from Cassis, a small seaside village next to
Marseille, France, found at a depth more than 100 feet under water the entrance
to a cave which 27,000 years ago was on dry land. It was yet another cave
showing human hands, but several had apparently amputated fingers, in a form
quite similar to images found in Gargas and a few more caves in the south of France and the north of Spain. Jean Clottes, the author, with David
Lewis-Williams, whom we met earlier in this chapter, of Shamans of Prehistory, learned to dive, and visited the cave with
Cosquer. He then wrote with Jean Courting The
Cave Beneath the Sea in which are reviewed theories of the hands and of cut
fingers, a quite complicated story that includes studying the rationale for the
hand imprints, and the sub-story of whether the fingers were actually missing
when applied to the wall. Perhaps, were they simply folded?
In a subsequent
book entitled A Cosmos in Stone,
David Lewis-Williams offered an expanded interpretation of the timeliness and
meaning of the handprints found among varied instances of
|