Taste, like
smell, is another sense based on a chemical analysis of material carried from the
thing we taste to the taste sensors, small entities found primarily on the
tongue. In general, the taste material is comprised of food that has been
placed in the mouth, physically broken into smaller components through chewing
with the teeth and partially dissolved in saliva. The taste sensors are termed
taste buds and are on the order of 10 microns in diameter. The tongue holds
approximately 90% of the 10,000 or so taste buds found within the mouth of a
normal human.
The sense of
taste is rather comparable to the sense of smell and, in fact, the two work in
concert. More specifically, the sense of smell has a strong influence on the
sense of taste. How something smells is reflected in how it tastes. While the
sense of smell can help in the recognition of things at a distance, when
coupled with the sense of taste the goal would seem to be the determination of
whether something should actually be ingested. Things that our digestive system
is going to find impossible to handle, such as decaying material, can generally
be detected sufficiently in advance to avoid actually swallowing them. While
they may leave a bad taste in our mouths, we at least have the opportunity to
dispel them from our mouths and avoid becoming ill, or worse.
An extremely
important sense for humans, especially for their mobility, is the detection of balance. It derives from sensory input
from the inner ear, from the eyes and perhaps other senses as well. As a
composite of these various sensory inputs, it provides to the brain an indicator
of orientation of the body. Based on this input, the brain can discern whether
the body is positioned upright or is perhaps in a prone position, or somewhere
in between. This sense is extremely important to the human sensori-motor
experience that establishes the metaphorical basis of our understanding of the
world around us. We prefer an up market and we don’t like to feel down.
Other human
senses that are sometimes identified reflect in fact the disconnection that can
occur between certain aspects of our cognitive functions and our sensori-motor
system. Specifically, when we encounter certain mental states, we seek
causality for those states outside of our sensori-motor system. One such aspect
of this is termed extra-sensory perception. Some people will insist that
they have a facility for anticipating the occurrence of physical events,
sometimes referred to as pre-cognition. Others claim the ability to cause
movement of disconnected objects, termed telekinesis. Such events, while
seeming to lack physical cause, fit within the foundations of religious systems
that we will begin to consider in the next chapter.
Throughout the
course of its evolutionary progression, Homo sapiens has
continually benefited from a capability for its constituent members to act in
concert. The search for sustenance for the mind and body is a significant impetus
for such collective action. While this capability exists within other social
species, it is more limited in size and scope. One can speculate that the
reason for this limitation is due to the mechanisms through which members of
the species interact with one another. As the members of any species become
more dispersed, physically, the means of interaction become problematic at
best. The basic facility that enables humans to thrive in the face of physical
diaspora is the multi-faceted means of communication that the species
has evolved.
Humans
communicate with others of their kind through all of the sensory channels that
we’ve considered above. In their most basic forms, these various channels are
used in low bandwidth modes; that is, they convey information at a much lower
rate than the respective channels are actually capable of handling. For
example, communication via sight consists primarily of signaling and
observation of actions or events, until more sophisticated mechanisms like,
say, hand gestures, are instituted using the sight input/output channel.
|