language, “2 + 2 =
4” is a sentence, where “2”, “+”, “=“, “4” are words. In fact, this is read as “Two
plus two equals four,” which we see maps very well with its natural language
equivalent.
Another formal
language is that of computers. “If x = 2 then stop” is a sentence, where “If”, “x”,
“=“, “2”, “then”, “stop” are words. This reads, “If the variable x equals 2
then stop,” again a natural sentence. Now, the main difference of formal
languages compared to natural languages is that whereas the latter map to the
entire sensori-motor experience of humans, the former maps to a much more
restricted domain, reflected in part by the restricted vocabulary, and in part
by the restricted set of rules applied when assembling sentences together, that
is, the grammar of the language. However, this restricted nature doesn’t make
formal languages easier to understand than natural ones. Remember, as we’ve
seen, formal languages can actually be made into equivalent subsets of natural
language. If the sentence “The integral of x is half the square of x plus a
constant” sounds complex to you, it won’t make the statement simpler to
understand if it is written in a formal way. However, when formal languages are
used by computers, instead of humans, the story is different. To a computer,
the sensori-motor mapping of the formal language, limited as it is in
vocabulary and rules, is, in fact, natural to it, just as our primary
sensations are natural to us as humans. For us, those primary sensations don’t
need explanation since they are just what we are. So what’s formal to us,
referring to a particular metaphoric mapping of our sensori-motor experience,
is, in fact, natural to the computer, referring directly to the computer’s
sensori-motor capability. Conversely, natural language, which refers to our
basic sensori-motor experience, is foreign to computers as long as they have
not evolved a sensori-motor apparatus, or a simulation thereof, comparable to
ours. But then, that is what this book is all about.
The precursor
species to modern man could communicate long before the ability of speech as we
know it today evolved. The brain of the archaic Homo erectus may be considered,
based on cranial capacity, as possessing the semantic capabilities to support
language, but the vocal facilities of
this particular species may not have been advanced enough mechanically to allow
for the nuances of natural language. Perhaps, not until some time before the
emergence of Neanderthals did the mechanical configuration of larynx, tongue
and throat evolve to support the full range of sounds that allowed natural
languages to be spoken. In fact, three distinct systems are required for humans
to realize the vocal facilities they currently possess.
First is the
mechanism for compressing air and expelling it in a manner capable of vibrating
a membrane that can produce sound. Second is the vibrating membrane itself;
that is the larynx, a mechanism that sits in the throat of a person in a manner
so as to allow air expelled from the lungs to pass over a membrane, the vocal
cords, so as to produce a sound. Finally, a throat, mouth and tongue mechanism
that can modulate the sounds emitted from the larynx. These mechanisms, in
concert, allow the production of sounds that can express the structure of
natural languages.
The culmination
of natural language came with the advent of writing,
the facility to express language through symbols which could be imprinted on
material and subsequently read back from that material. This brings us to the earliest
forms of recorded history of the species, a facility that separates humans from
all other species. That is, mankind appears to be the only species that has
prepared a permanent visual image of complex thought that can be passed to
other members of the species over long distances or over long periods of time.
Finally, we draw
your attention to the communication facilities provided through art. In our first chapter, we alluded to
the use of art as an efficient means of context sensitive communication. Please
note that in referring to art, we’re referring to the full variety of art
forms. Indeed, there are various types that impact on all of the human senses,
both individually and collectively. Consider
|