cognitive levels of human brain activity. It is difficult if
not impossible for the average person to cause the heart to palpitate through
conscious thought.
It is easy to
relate the neural chassis to computer architectures. Through its connection to
the various reactive motor facilities located throughout the body, this
facility functions very much as an independent, self-contained input/output
channel. That is, certain stimuli, when detected by peripheral sensors
connected to the human distributed nervous system, elicit immediate reactions,
such as that of the muscle system causing a foot to jerk or the whole body to
jump. The pathway of the signal from the receptor to a point of control and
then back to the appropriate muscle can be of different length. A computer
component analogous to the autonomic components of the body is a fan that
moderates the temperature of internal circuitry, or a surge protector that
automatically filters spurious electrical events. A component analogous to
external sensori-motor elements is the apparatus that eliminates offensive
network packets of information at the source in case of computer attacks that
attempt to flood an input channel of a secure core to deny its processing of
otherwise valid information.
In the evolution
tree, reptiles precede mammals. A contrasting study between reptiles and
mammals allows studying differential properties of the organism attached to
particular characteristics of the brain. The upper neural apparatus of reptiles
accounts for behaviors like territoriality, courtship, and submissive displays,
as well as hunting, grooming and mating activities. By comparing those
behaviors across reptiles, as well as across other non-mammalian vertebrates,
it is possible to recognize patterns of behaviors associated with aspects of
the brain of reptiles. Through anatomical, chemical, neurological and surgical
work, as well as phylogenetic and ontogenetic considerations, it is possible to
define a prototypical model for the upper brain of reptiles. From there, it is
possible to practice further experiments exploring the functional properties of
the brain, in reptiles as well as in other species. MacLean calls this
proto-reptilian brain formation the striatal
complex, but many, including him, refer to it also as the reptilian brain, and we will follow that
practice.
The next step,
obviously, is to refine the model of the reptilian brain by comparing its
formation with similar constructs in mammals, and eventually in humans. It is
from identifying in reptiles and mammals similar constructs that MacLean comes
to consider the reptilian brain as one of the three components of the triune
brain. A natural hypothesis is that behaviors associated with the reptilian
brain would be forming a pattern extending from reptiles to the full range of
mammals. While this can be readily verified in some mammals through intrusive
operations, it is more difficult in upper mammals and humans. A combination of
medical observations, physiological and psychological experiments, and new
non-invasive techniques like functional magnetic resonance imaging allow
investigating the hypothesis in greater length. The reptilian denomination
obviously does not mean that we are all running around with the brain of a
lizard in our heads, despite our predilections towards associating people with
reptiles in a very pejorative manner. Rather it is simply an observation that
the human brain is an artifact of an evolutionary process, and evolutionary
processes tend to build upon successful traits rather than discarding such
traits and starting over again. This said, we are ready to consider mammals, an
important step because it allows us to enter the realm of emotions, that we
have already identified as a central element in the evaluation of trust
infrastructures of computer networks.
|