turtle?” “Well, it rides on a larger turtle,” replied the lady. “And
then,” queried the young student, “What about that turtle?” “Sitting on another
turtle,” said the woman, who then concluded the conversation. “I know where you’re
going with this young man, and you should know that it’s turtles, all the way
down!”
Well, in fact we
really do need to understand where the world ends and the turtles begin. Perhaps
more important, we need to know where the turtles end; and, what do we find in
their ending? Through the ages, as a species we have developed a more rigorous
understanding of the world around us. From that understanding, we establish the
causality through which we derive trust in the mechanisms around us and in the
processes that we engage in. When we reach the boundary of that understanding,
we enter the realm of mythical understanding. We will consider the relationship
among trust, causality and process in much greater detail in Chapters 7 and 8.
In this chapter, we seek to provide a rather succinct appraisal of a bit of
what we understand about living organisms and their inherent processes compared
and contrasted with what we understand about computers and their processes.
We are all made
of star stuff and DNA is the blueprint of our construction. DNA can help us
understand something of the history of our journey, albeit without telling us
if we found our consciousness in primeval ooze or in celestial grace; “dust
thou art to dust returneth,” just add water. Research is beginning to unlock
detailed interpretations of DNA sentences and how these sentences are
subsequently translated into biophysical entities. Across a very large range of
species, the commonality of DNA is startling. There is considerable overlap
among seemingly divergent species with respect to their physiological makeup.
So, perhaps its not turtles all the way down, but it certainly appears to be
turtle parts at least a good part of the way. That brings us to our more
specific goal for this chapter, to understand something of the detailed physiology
of the human species. It is from this physiology that humankind establishes the
metaphorical basis through which the complex interactions of people, including
the recurrent appearance of religion throughout history, are made part of the
cognizance of the species. Perhaps then we can draw parallels between such
occurrences and the development and evolution of computer architectures,
thereby providing some insight into what the future evolution of that family of
species holds.
Human
information processing has evolved over millions of years, whereas computers
have evolved over only a few decades. Comparing the human brain, which has been
stable in its current form for tens of thousand of years, to the computer,
which has existed in something like its current form for about half a century,
is bound to be a meaningless exercise unless one is very careful with the
details of the comparison. For example, it is quite common to see comparisons
between computers and people expressed in terms of software and hardware.
Software, it is said, is like the mind, and hardware like the brain. In
actuality, this is hardly illustrative, or conducive to elaboration, because
the brain and its implementation details and mechanisms are in general only
qualitatively understood and their relationship to the mind is still an area of
fundamental research. Perhaps more surprising is that the distinction between
hardware and software in the computer domain is not clear either, or at least
it is becoming less clear. For example, the number of processing elements found
in a large scale computer, or in a washing machine for that matter, makes the
delineation between hardware and software almost a matter of faith; perhaps an
odd juxtaposition of theological bent. The parallels are there; we just need to
start at the correct beginning and measure at the correct way posts.
Humans, like
computers, can be considered either in isolation or in groups in terms of
information architecture. A single person, interacting with the surrounding
environment, processes information derived through sensori-motor channels, just
as an isolated computer at home might process input
|