physical
processes that stem from basic characteristics such as those studied in quantum
mechanics provide a significant degree of variability. Consequently, we can
learn to work within the constraints of physical laws. We can learn to mitigate
their effects in some sense, but we can’t change their basic character. As a
result, the physical ecosystem is an environment in which the trust infrastructure
is congruent to the policy infrastructure. Essentially, within this
infrastructure, trust derives from physical laws. While the interplay of many
physical interactions creates the concept of chaos, the underlying rules are
moderately straightforward. On the other hand, when the concept of social
ecosystems is introduced, the rules governing interactions become much more
complex, because they are mutable and they appear, in many instances, totally
arbitrary.
Within a single
trust infrastructure, one or more policy infrastructures can be established.
Each policy infrastructure defines a context for interactions that includes the
form of interactions and the rules governing those interactions. Within the United States the various governmental entities form a
number of hierarchically connected policy infrastructures. From a governance
standpoint, all of these policy infrastructures exist within a single trust
infrastructure in which the root of trust is established by the Constitution of
the United
States.
This document establishes a social compact through which the interactional
relationships among citizens and government are defined. Trust emanates from
the Constitution based on personal commitment of the citizens. When a critical
mass of the citizenry no longer holds this commitment, then a new trust
infrastructure must prevail. If no other social ecosystem is established, then
the new, default trust infrastructure will be the physical ecosystem, with its
associated immediate violence.
Within the trust
infrastructure established by the Constitution, national and state governments
have been deemed separate sovereigns, meaning that the laws within each
jurisdiction can be independently defined and the procedures for adjudicating
those laws can be independently applied. All of these separate jurisdictions
are, however, subject to the basic precepts of governance established by the
Constitution. As an example of variances among these disparate policy
infrastructures, consider that execution under the death penalty, as the
extreme consequence of failure to abide by the rules of the infrastructures, is
more commonly applied in the State of Texas than in any other state in the United States. This is due largely to the manner in
which appellate procedures, a part of the larger scale process for effecting
the interaction that is the rule of law, are conducted. In many states, these
appellate procedures extend the delay between trial and sentence fulfillment
almost indefinitely. In Texas, however, strict rules for the appellate process
have been established through law, making the process much more expeditious,
resulting in the high number of executions.
Religious
organizations within the United States are established under the purview of
constitutional government. Such organizations can be deemed as tax exempt,
removing them from many of the coercive mechanisms that governments can exert.
However, rules adopted within a religion are subject to significant constraints
by government, rendering them, in general, subordinate to secular law. For
example, certain religions view the reception of blood transfusions as counter
to the moral code established by the church. While such rejection of medical
treatment is acknowledged by government in many instances, in situations where
the subject person is not deemed fully capable of expressing an informed
consent to the refusal of treatment, such as minor children or those found to
be mentally incompetent, then the state can mandate treatment against the
patient’s expressed wishes. In general, in the United States, religions cannot exert, as a
consequence of interactions within the religious policy infrastructure, rules
that have the force of law found within government-established policy
infrastructures.
|