formation and operation of groups. Grouping
mechanisms, or perhaps a bit more formally stated, social orders form a central
theme of this book. We will observe that the evolutionary progression of social
order is very much an application of the process of metaphor development and
subsequent redefinition. This is how our Prologue started. Later in the book we
will further consider the premise that a salient feature of modern humans is
that of metaphoric comprehension. Hence, the reader must also be a bit wary of
the commonly held definitions of the metaphors we address. We will attempt to
make our specific understanding clear and in some instances we may deviate a
bit from convention.
Our trip is of
necessity interdisciplinary. Traveling from Chicago to Los Angeles on old Route 66 involved traversing a
great variety of terrain. So it is with our journey. The prairies of the upper Midwest are far removed from the rugged vistas
of Death Valley. Likewise, human physiology and computer
programming are similarly displaced along our route of travel. In due course, we
will introduce our perceptions of the many disciplines that we will encounter.
For those with reading tastes and experiences consistent with our own, some of
this detail may seem a bit redundant. However, for those more comfortable in
only certain of the domains, which we expect to be the greater number, the
detail is necessary. Where the trail meanders into slog, we’ll suggest an
appropriate detour over the high ground. Our intent is to provide context and
nuance. Our goal is a work that provides a prism through which is displayed the
rainbow hidden in the light emanating from the fog.
Our first step
is the assertion that human social orders are a direct manifestation of the
species. They derive as much from explicit anatomical and physiological
characteristics as from cognitive impulse. In fact, we suggest that the
cognitive impulses aimed at establishing social order are themselves anatomical
and physiological manifestations. Anatomy establishes our means and model of
thought. Physiology guides how we think and what we think about. Subsequently,
we observe that computers are tools of the species. Interconnections of these
tools form computer networks that are best exemplified as direct extensions of
social orders. Thus, based on an assumption that we may be traveling to common
destinations from similar points of departure, we anticipate a parallel between
organic evolutionary mechanisms and the mechanisms of technological design of
complex systems. Starting from the physical world that establishes the foundation
of the metaphors through which we express and understand the social world, we
will attempt to use the well known characteristics of each domain to better
understand the lesser known characteristics of the other. Prayer is a well
investigated subject in theology, whereas trust is a well formalized concept of
computer networks. The reverse is not yet true, which we will see creates the
opportunity to better appreciate each of theology and computers from a new
perspective.
Our plan for
proceeding is somewhat historical, somewhat physiological and somewhat
sociological in nature. First, we want to draw parallels of the evolution of
computers and computer systems over the last half-century to the evolution of
major biological species. The comparisons that we will make are not always intended
to be literal. Often, they are simply indicative that similar evolutionary
processes are at work. The overarching framework for selection within the
computer world is akin to the biological selection mechanisms of living organisms.
Species of computers and computer systems are successful in adapting to the
changing world around them, or not; but, the framework within which adaptation
must occur is formed by processes of virtually biological qualities.
We begin our
journey by considering the means of design, construction, change and evaluation
within the domains of social orders and computer networks. This illustration of
the foundational
|