being able to recite or produce copies of
some significant subset of these credentials is sufficient to authenticate the
assertion of identity on the part of a person. “After all,” the reasoning goes,
“who else but the person in question could lay hands on all this personal
information?” “Who, indeed?”
Rarely within
this chain is there any strong, objectively verifiable connection between any
credential and the actual, biophysical person. This, then, is the root of a
growing systemic problem within our social ecosystems; a problem we refer to as
identity theft. The term, identity
theft, is something of a misnomer since the actual problem is one that involves
the granting of privileges related to identity without satisfactorily
authenticating that identity. The wrong person is allowed to spend the money in
a personal checking account, for example. The real problem is not that someone
else stole the account owner’s identity. The problem is that the bank granted
the privileges of the account owner’s identity to someone else. In other words,
the bank did not satisfactorily authenticate the identity of the account owner
prior to allowing a debit transaction against their bank account. Hence, the
process is not trustworthy and, in fact, constitutes a threat to the social
ecosystem.
To this point,
we have considered two pragmatic examples of trust derived through process. In
fact, the trust imbued by one process attested to by a birth certificate then
conveys to the second process in which a social security number is obtained.
The two credentials that derive from the processes are elements of what we will
discuss in the next chapter as experiential
identity. Interestingly enough, without rigorous connection of the
credentials to the person, both processes display characteristics of religious
structures in that both involve trust derived from subjective evaluation; in
essence, both derived trust as an act of faith. In each case, faith is derived
first through logical consideration of the environment surrounding the
interactions involved and then considering the details of the process of
interactions within that environment. We might want to start associating
process with ritual in these
circumstances. The predictability of set processes brings them close to the
formality of rituals, which we would suggest brings confidence in a community’s
commitment through repeated affirmation of determined synchronized action.
While our examples were rather simplistic, the whole solidity of ritualized
processes has been explored in depth in Victor Turner’s groundbreaking The Anthropology of Performance.
The discussion for
the remainder of this chapter will be aimed at better understanding these
concepts within the context of human social structure and then relating these
concepts to the software used in computer systems. In the course of this
consideration, we will draw parallels between the operations of the mind and
such software. In so doing, we hope to express some rudimentary thoughts on the
feedback loop that seems to be at work in this provisioning process. We suggest
that this consideration will illustrate how trust derives from both
environments through rather similar processes.
Expanding
prowess of the brain evokes a good summary of the evolutionary uniqueness of Homo sapiens. The physical structure of
vertebrate species is remarkably similar. A turtle or a fish displays
anthropomorphic characteristics. Little wonder that we can readily believe the
tales of mermaids or that the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles could gain wide
acceptance in adolescent circles. The world’s great religions take the same
tack; human striving for truth and beauty is more an activity of the mind than
other actions of the body. Buddhism teaches the search for enlightenment as a
cognitive process driven by faith in the end goal, which is the attainment of
the state of pure enlightenment. Faith provides a degree of trust, which from
our perspective appears as one level of the ranging emotional state that
culminates in ecstasy. Protestant Christianity teaches that the right to enter
the gates of heaven cannot be earned by good deeds. Rather, they
|