parallels with computer based memory in Chapter 8 that might lead
one down that particular bunny trail.
Cognition is the term applied to the acquisition
and interpretation of knowledge. Not just the reception of and reflexive
reaction to various physical stimuli, but the integration and correlation of
various sensory inputs to derive an understanding of the cause of the physical
stimuli and the synthesis of a response appropriate to this comprehensive
understanding. In considering Maslow’s hierarchy of needs in the previous
chapter, one might in general view that the deficiency needs primarily drive
reflexive responses to stimuli, while the growth needs drive cognitive
responses.
It is the
cognitive systems of the brain that truly set modern man apart from his hominid
precursors. The cognitive ability to think about the world observed through the
sensory system in an abstract way, and then to influence or control the motor
system’s response through this abstract thought, offers humans the capability
to not just be reactive to the world, but proactive as well.
Structures and
mechanisms made available by the brain and the complementary nervous systems
facilitate the cognitive processes of the mind. Many areas of the brain are
pre-ordained from the time of their construction to fulfill certain functions
in the cognitive process.
In the early
1990’s, a research team at the University of Parma in Parma, Italy, headed by Giocomo Rizzolatti,
discovered a class of neurons and neuron structures that would appear to
provide a hard, physical basis for the brain’s ability to deal with contextual
situations of complex stimuli along with the induced actions or reactions taken
in response. While the exact sequence of events leading to their discovery may
actually be more mundane, the urban legend tale of the discovery of mirror
neurons is illustrative of one of those serendipitous occurrences of research.
In an experiment designed to observe the behavior of a primate during various
acts of stimulation, for example the stimulation of certain areas of a monkey’s
brain while eating an ice cream cone, it was subsequently discovered that these
subject areas of the brain of the test animal also exhibited the same
stimulation when observing a lab technician eating an ice cream cone. The
conjecture was that specific neurons or more likely collections of neurons
forming specific neural networks within the brain are trained to represent a
specific activity context. These neurons or neuron collectives then present an
expression and understanding of the stimuli and the expected response actions
when this activity, associated with this context, is observed in oneself or
other individuals. In essence, our sensori-motor experiences build a contextual
representation of activity in such a way as to allow us to internalize our
understanding of the actions and reactions within the context of that activity
when we perceive it in ourselves or in other individuals.
Subsequent
studies by the University of Parma team, and by other researchers, such as
discussed in the November, 2006, Scientific American article Mirrors in the
Mind by Giacomo Rizzolatti, Leonardo Fogassi and Vittorio Gallese, have
shown that mirror neuron comprehension extends to emotional as well as physical
responses when stimulated by various, sometimes subtle sensory input. They
observed that seeing a look of disgust on another’s face as they smell a
distasteful odor evoked a similar feeling of disgust within us. As suggested in
the article, a man, upon seeing a fleeting smile on the face of his lady friend
as she picks a flower, enables him to quickly surmise that the flower will be
given to him. The very powerful result from this particular wiring in our
brains allows us to quickly, almost effortlessly, establish a context for
sensory stimuli based on our individual experiences, and from that context
determine a likely and appropriate response when we observe activities within
this context in others, and, naturally, vice-versa. To link this back to the
central theme of this book, this would appear to be a biophysical mechanism
through which our minds can quickly establish trust in the interpretation of an
interaction onset and the
|