certain of its software characteristics (which might be presented as wrapped in
the concepts of complex policy) have yet to be supplanted. In fact, the
transition from mainframes to mini-computers involved something of a retrograde
advance for software systems.
The third epoch
is the personal computer era. Wrought from another adaptation event, personal
computers were based upon the high volume production of basic processor units
which, while significantly less capable than the processors of mainframes or
mini-computers, were nonetheless able to address many of the basic issues faced
by the office worker as well as peoples’ private activities as well. From a
software standpoint, if mini-computers entailed a retrograde advance then
personal computers turned that into a rout. Certainly the mainframe developers
could have considered the early personal computers as evolutionary throwbacks;
a reversion from vertebrates to insects if you will. As Darrel Royal, legendary
football coach at the
University of Texas so eloquently commented in equating a
decided underdog victor over the Longhorns to cockroaches, “It’s not what they
eat that’s the problem, it’s what they get into and mess up!” In any case,
limited in scope and capability though they may have been, personal computers
certainly brought the species out of the pure workplace and into the home,
giving us computers that travel with us and that provide us services on a 24x7
basis.
The fourth epoch
is the personal electronic devices era. Traditionally well represented by
cellular phones and their Subscriber Identity Modules (SIM), they are used in the
billions as of this writing. Newer forms have developed, such as personal
digital assistants, e-mail communicators (such as the much used Blackberry
e-mail manager) and Radio-Frequency Identification (RFID) tags (such as the
tags used to pay toll on the highway). Based on the adaptation event comprised
of a small assembly of computer processor and memory, we entered this era in
the early 1990’s and at the present time we are still in an environment
involving competition among the relevant technologies. The competition is
constructive at the moment, perhaps indicating a time of sufficient resources
for nature to experiment. However, the competition is turning into a
dog-eat-dog contest.
In considering
each epoch, we will consider not just the technology, but also the dominant
companies involved in each. The evolutionary process in this case involves the
organizational environment as well as the technical. Financial considerations
will be discussed rather tersely at best. The transition between epochs generally
finds an inflation-adjusted cost of raw computing power to vary inversely with
the numbers of computers or their power.
Mathematical
computation has always invited the invention of performance enhancing tools. In
early days, marks or pebbles of different sizes were used to represent
different numbers of items; in essence, objects were used as metaphorical
representations of collections of other objects. The abacus was one of the
earliest mechanisms that facilitated relatively simple mathematical operations.
In more recent centuries, more complex mechanical assemblies were constructed
to perform complex, repetitive operations. In any specific era, the nature of
these tools was limited by the construction technologies currently available.
It required a true mutational discovery in 1879 to provide the seminal event in
the development of the computer; an invention by the icon of modern invention,
Thomas Alva Edison. His invention was, of course a commercially viable,
integrated system for electric lighting, exemplified by the incandescent electric
light bulb. The light bulb went on; a new idea for the ages was the result. The
symbolism is almost staggering.
|