universal mobile technology and the
architecture of the World Wide Web, have come from Europe or other parts of the world, their
optimal business realization in software product form seems to have happened in
the United
States.
Our central case in point is the propagation of Internet technology, which has
been in recent years the major evolutionary factor in the percolation of new
system architectures, following the general Darwinian rules that were
themselves at the core of American democracy and capitalism. In fact, at about
the same time that the Internet was emerging from its formative cocoon within
DARPA and a select university culture within the United States, France introduced the Minitel network. It
offered many of the same characteristics as the Internet. However, based as it
was in the strict discipline of government control reflective of the Catholic
heritage of France, it lacked the propagation impetus
necessary to compete with the geometric progression of Internet dispersion
during the decade of the 1990’s.
We see the
emergence of democratic systems from a protestant Christian basis as one
current boundary of the continuing evolution of group-selection mechanisms.
Within the United
States,
one might speak of the separation of church and state, but conceptually we see
democratic institutions as a direct refinement of religious systems and as
specifically subsuming these systems. The primary difference is found in the
basis of the trust infrastructures that are the natural boundary of state
democracy. The religious preeminence found in the Declaration of Independence
anticipates the ascendance of democratic control by the Constitution over
church in a conscious decision by the founders of the United States. It was a decision that was subscribed
to by the resident populations that confirmed the governmental foundation of
the United States Constitution. The church exerts influence over policy in the
form of the evaluation of moral values, but the authority over the structure of
the policy framework lies with representative democracy.
In the context
of our evaluation of the evolution of computer technology, we can compare this
situation with other relationships between religion, church and state, as with
Buddhism and Hinduism in much of central Asia, Confucianism in China and Shinto
in Japan, Catholicism in Europe and South America, Judaism in Israel, and the
same or other religions in other parts of the world. With Islam, for example,
the relationship is typically one in which religion is either ostensibly superior
to state or invokes very specific policy definitions within the state
construct. In some instances, for example Iran, the state is an institutional
theocracy; sharia effectively forms
the basis for the law of the land. Within this social order, Islam is the
superior trust infrastructure with the state being subsumed by it. Pakistan and Turkey
are on a democratic spectrum defined in relationship
with Islam. Should we then say that democracy
is the sharia of Christianity, expressing in one formula the conflicting
tensions on the trust infrastructure? (We are not alone is this question, as
exemplified in Religion et démocratie,
edited by Patrick Michel.) In all of these example situations, the central
point of interest to us is how trust infrastructures are established and how they
impact subordinate policy infrastructures. Specifically, how can these
mechanisms and relationships be translated into a model for social ecosystems
and, through this model, can we better understand the development and
utilization of computers, computer systems and networks?
So, let us begin
the process of extracting a model of social ecosystems through which we can
then qualitatively examine the structure of human grouping mechanisms found
within them; and, lest it be forgotten, the primary mechanisms through which
group endeavors are effected are those facilities that we’ve previously termed trust and policy. To do so, we
need to first examine the evolutionary stages of groups, what characteristics
influenced their progression and the situation currently manifested by the
resulting mechanisms.
|